In a growing number of cases though, the target of Mike Beaudet’s
investigation is typically a single individual who, if really involved in
wrongdoing, can be easily removed, suspended, fired or reviewed by simple
telling a few people. And in these
cases, it is clear that telling a few people will more directly and discreetly
solve the problem (if there even is one), without creating a media circus that
exposes children, disrupts communities and schools, and creates fear, anger and
polarity. In some cases, a school might
be forced to remove a teacher without a clear cut legal cause – just because of
bad publicity – and thus still pay them.
And when someone choses to expose their community to a media circus, to
leave vulnerable populations who are allegedly at risk – still at risk, to keep
the secret for weeks on end until Fox gets their TV slot that person’s motives
must lie elsewhere. Communities need to
get tough on Fox Undercover informants as soon as everyone knows who they are,
confronting them, exposing them and holding them accountable for their
actions.
So, the simple litmus test is this: Was informing Fox the only way that anyone
would listen? Our country has a history
of journalists uncovering a government or corporate corruption scandal that
traditional law enforcement were afraid to uncover, didn’t have the resources
to uncover or were involved in themselves.
In the 1970’s Hooker Chemical Corp sold a piece of land to the Niagara
Falls School Board for $1, hiding the extent of toxic waste that they had
dumped there. It was not until local
residents became informants to the Niagara Falls Gazette that the cover up was
investigated and finally revealed, and this was after more than half of
children born in what became known as the “Love Canal” had at least one birth
defect. Individuals often just don’t
have the resources, the clout or the knowhow to fight corruption and cover
ups. But this does not apply to the
vast majority of Fox Undercover stories, where a note to a person or two, an
email, even a phone conversation, might easily address the employment of one
private person doing one small job. And
thus the test fails for the vast majority of Fox Undercover informants, whose
tip off seems to us like someone who simply wants a smear campaign and a
circus, and is willing to put their own community at risk.
Finally, there is a great danger when you have an informant
who is tattling on a person, rather
than an underlying problem: And that
great danger is that possibility that there may be misinformation that cannot
be truly verified, resulting in a news report full of hearsay and speculation. In 1997 a US Customs official in San Diego
passed a memo to CBS 60 Minutes allegedly written by the head of the branch
about ignoring drug trafficking. The
memo was verified by the same informant “certifying” the document himself. After the branch manager’s career was
devastated, it was later found out that the informant forged the document as an
act of personal revenge.
Fox Undercover provides a phone number and a web form for someone to become a Fox Undercover informant, ie to provide Fox 25 Undercover with a tip for a story. We wonder how many of these are anonymous and why.
Update: Occasionally we are contacted by people thinking that we are Fox Undercover. We have never once claimed to be affiliated with Fox or Fox News or News Corp in any way and we always tell people that they have contacted the wrong people. We will just point out though that those who have contacted us have appeared to be not particularly literate and in all cases, it seems like they are tattletales more than concerned citizens. Maybe these are not the most typical Fox Undercover informants (since they did mistake us for Fox afterall) but we couldn't help but notice a trend and we thought you had a right to know.
Finally, we have startling new data on local and state police use of Mike Beaudet as a pawn of sorts. More to come on how police in Massachusetts use Fox Undercover to their advantage.
Fox Undercover provides a phone number and a web form for someone to become a Fox Undercover informant, ie to provide Fox 25 Undercover with a tip for a story. We wonder how many of these are anonymous and why.
Update: Occasionally we are contacted by people thinking that we are Fox Undercover. We have never once claimed to be affiliated with Fox or Fox News or News Corp in any way and we always tell people that they have contacted the wrong people. We will just point out though that those who have contacted us have appeared to be not particularly literate and in all cases, it seems like they are tattletales more than concerned citizens. Maybe these are not the most typical Fox Undercover informants (since they did mistake us for Fox afterall) but we couldn't help but notice a trend and we thought you had a right to know.
Finally, we have startling new data on local and state police use of Mike Beaudet as a pawn of sorts. More to come on how police in Massachusetts use Fox Undercover to their advantage.
No comments:
Post a Comment